SUMMARY BACKGROUND: Cerebrovascular accident (or stroke) and ischemic heart disease are the the major causes of death in the world. It is estimated that about 85% of strokes are ischemic in origin. Reperfusion therapy in the acute phase of ischemic stroke with a recombinant human tissue plasminogen activator is effective, but some factors influence the success of this treatment. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical aspects and possible determinants for reperfusion after venous thrombolysis. METHODS: This is a retrospective, cross-sectional, observational study based on a review of hospital records of inpatients diagnosed with ischemic stroke treated with intravenous thrombolysis, the main outcome being reperfusion or not. RESULTS: Data from this study revealed a predominance of females in the group of reperfused patients and males in the non-reperfused group, both maintaining moderate severity on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale and admission without statistical significance (p>0.18). In addition, the mean admission severity score was 13.2 for the group of reperfused patients and 14.2 for those not reperfused, and the mean ejection fraction of both groups was within normal functionality, with a mean of 0.50 for reperfused patients and 0.62 for non-reperfused patients. CONCLUSION: We found an association between successful venous chemical thrombolysis reperfusion and lower mortality in patients with acute stroke.

ABSTRACT Background: Excessive weight gain is a current concern among People Living with HIV (PLHIV) starting ART. Objectives: To evaluate the weight gain after 48-weeks of ART in naive patients, according with baseline CD4 count. Methods: PLHIV starting 3TC + TDF + DTG with at least 48-weeks of follow up in two AIDS referral centers were stratified by baseline CD4 count (lower or higher than 200 cells/mm3). Data on CD4 count, HIV viral load, weight/Body Mass Index (BMI), lipids and glucose levels were collected at baseline, 24 and 48 weeks of treatment. For analysis purpose, patients were categorized according to their BMI progression. Results: A total of 270 patients were included in the study. Mean CD4 count were 78.3 ± 61.7 and 536.7 ± 273 cells/mm3 for low and high CD4 count groups, respectively (p < 0.001). Baseline BMI was significantly lower in low CD4 group (21.7 vs. 23.6 Kg/m2, p < 0.001). Patients in low CD4 group gained more weight than those in high CD4 group (11.2 ± 8.5 kg vs. 2.2 ± 4.2 Kg, p = 0.004). Overall weight gain was higher in women, regardless group (13.1 ± 7.9 Kg vs. 1.4 ± 3.6 Kg for women and men, respectively, p < 0.001). The proportion of overweight/obesity significantly increased in low CD4 group. Viral suppression rate was high for both groups. At week 48 the overall proportion of overweight/obesity was like that reported for the Brazilian population. Conclusions: Weight gain in the present study indicates a “return to health” phenomenon. Excessive weight gain was more frequent in women.

ABSTRACT Introduction: COVID-19 can trigger different clinical presentations in distinct population groups, some of which are considered at higher risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Little is known about the susceptibility of certain populations to the infection. Objectives: We aimed to determine the prevalence of COVID-19 among People Living With HIV/AIDS (PLWH) attending a tertiary public hospital in Salvador, Brazil, patients with active pulmonary tuberculosis and Hospital's Healthcare Workers (HCW), and to compare their SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels. Methods: In this observational study we included 2294 participants from June 9, 2020 to August 10, 2021. IgG SARS-CoV-2 antibodies from all participants (275 PLWH, 42 with active tuberculosis and 1977 healthcare workers) were measured. Prevalence of COVID-19 and antibodies indexes were compared across groups. Results: We detected a higher prevalence of COVID-19 in patients with active tuberculosis (42.9%) than in PLWH (22.5%) or HCW (11.7%). Previously vaccinated participants with a COVID-19 history had median higher IgG antibody indexes (8.2; IQR: 5.5–10) than those vaccinated who did not have COVID-19 until the time of this study (4.1; IQR: 1.6–6.2, p < 0.001). Conclusion: Prevalence of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection was higher among tuberculosis patients than that found in HCW and PLWH, but antibodies levels were similar across groups.

ABSTRACT Objectives: The objective of the present study was to evaluate a possible association between personality factors (PF) and the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of type 1 diabetes (T1D) patients. This allows for the investigation of obstacles related to treatment type and the presence of complications in HRQoL. Materials and methods: This cross-sectional study enrolled 78 patients aged 13-67 years from two diabetes clinics. PF was evaluated using the validated questionnaire Inventory of the Five Great Personality Factors. HRQoL was determined using the Brazilian Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale (B-PAID) questionnaire. The chi-square test, Fisher's exact test, and Welch's modified two-sample t-test were used to establish relationships. Results: In this sample of 46 women and 32 men with T1D and mean A1C of 8%-9%, we observed great suffering in 58.97% and that HRQoL was worse in women. “Openness” was the most prevalent PF and “extroversion” the least prevalent. “Neuroticism” facilitated a tendency to tolerate suffering. Conclusion: T1D patients’ personalities influence their treatment. The PF “neuroticism” is potentially related to better HRQoL. Brazilian T1D patients indicated great suffering in their HRQoL, which may be characteristic across the country. Women experienced worse HRQoL, which is in line with world literature. However, the limited sample size in this study warrant further research to test the hypotheses.

RESUMO JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: Dores musculoesqueléticas estão entre as condições mais incapacitantes, agravando quadros de multimorbidade. Dificuldades no tratamento da dor e multimorbidade ressaltam a importância do estudo dessas populações. O objetivo deste estudo foi determinar a frequência de dor musculoesquelética e multimorbidade, principais queixas em pacientes admitidos em serviço de fisioterapia. MÉTODOS: Este é um estudo observacional de corte transversal. Pacientes com 50 anos ou mais foram avaliados através do Inventário Breve de Dor, Questionário de Incapacidade de Roland Morris para dor em geral, formulário de dados sociodemográficos e clínicos e teste timed-up-and-go. Foram realizadas análises descritivas através da distribuição de números absolutos e proporções para as variáveis categóricas. RESULTADOS: A amostra foi composta por 62 pacientes com 2 ou mais regiões dolorosas, 88,7% mulheres com mediana de idade de 67 anos [IQR 62-72], 81% com índice de massa corpórea acima da normalidade, 71% hipertensos e 97% com multimorbidade. A mediana de regiões dolorosas foi de 7 [IQR 4-8], sendo as mais prevalentes lombar e joelhos (87%); 66% dos pacientes descrevem dor intensa e mediana da duração da dor de 7,5 anos [IQR 3-15]. O alto número de regiões dolorosas teve maior interferência (p<0,05) na vida dos indivíduos e foi associado ao sexo feminino (p=0,04) e a ocorrência de queda no último ano (p<0,003). CONCLUSÃO: A população descrita é majoritariamente composta por mulheres hipertensas, com sobrepeso, multimorbidade, dor crônica e alto número de regiões dolorosas, interferindo nos componentes de afetividade e atividades da vida. Faz-se necessário contínuo estudo da dor musculoesquelética crônica, difusa e multimorbidade, buscando melhores intervenções para estes pacientes.

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Musculoskeletal pain is among the most disabling conditions, aggravating multimorbidity scenarios. Difficulties in the treatment of pain and multimorbidity highlight the importance of the study of these populations. The objective of this study was to determine the frequency of musculoskeletal pain and multimorbidity, the main complaints in patients admitted to physiotherapy services. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional observational study. Patients 50 years or older were evaluated using the Brief Pain Inventory, Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire for general pain, sociodemographic and clinical data form, and timed-up-and-go test. Descriptive analyses were performed through the distribution of absolute numbers and proportions for categorical variables. RESULTS: The sample consisted of 62 patients with 2 or more painful regions, 88.7% women with a median age of 67 years [IQR 62-72], 81% with body mass index above normal, 71% hypertensive and 97% with multimorbidity. The median of painful regions was 7 [IQR 4-8], the most prevalent being low back and knees (87%); 66% of patients describe severe pain, and median pain duration of 7.5 years [IQR 3-15]. The high number of painful regions had greater interference (p<0.05) in the lives of individuals and was associated with females (p=0.04) and the occurrence of a fall in the last year (p<0.003). CONCLUSION: The described population is mostly composed of hypertensive, overweight women with multimorbidity, chronic pain and a high number of painful regions, interfering in activities and in the affective components of life. A continuous study of chronic, diffuse musculoskeletal pain and multimorbidity is necessary, seeking better interventions for these patients.

RESUMO Objetivo Avaliar a associação entre adesão ao tratamento e mortalidade em pacientes com doença pulmonar obstrutiva crônica (DPOC) tratados no Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS). Métodos Este é um estudo de coorte de pacientes com DPOC moderada a grave acompanhados em um programa público de gerenciamento de doença (PGD) baseado no cuidado farmacêutico. Todos os indivíduos que foram a óbito um ano após o início da coorte foram pareados por idade com aqueles que permaneceram vivos ao final do período da coorte. A adesão ao tratamento foi medida através dos registros de dispensação de medicamentos. Os pacientes que receberam pelo menos 90% das doses prescritas foram considerados aderentes ao tratamento. Resultados Dos 333 pacientes (52,8%, idade ≥ 65 anos: 67,9% do sexo masculino), 67,3% aderiram ao tratamento (taxa de adesão = 87,2%). A mortalidade foi associada à não adesão (p = 0,04), presença de sintomas (mMRC ≥ 2) e uso de tratamento para DPOC. Os óbitos foram associados à não adesão, presença de sintomas e hospitalização prévia. Após ajuste, pacientes não aderentes ao tratamento foram quase duas vezes mais propensos a ir a óbito em comparação àqueles aderentes (hazard ratio = 1,86; [IC95%, 1,16-2,98], p = 0,01). Conclusão A não adesão ao tratamento foi associada à maior mortalidade entre pacientes com DPOC de moderada a grave tratados no SUS. Estratégias de monitoramento e otimização da adesão devem ser fomentadas a fim de reduzir a mortalidade relacionada à DPOC.

ABSTRACT Objective To evaluate the association between adherence to treatment and mortality among Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients treated in the Brazilian public health system. Methods This is cohort study of moderate-to-severe COPD patients monitored in a public pharmaceutical care-based Disease Management Program (DMP). All subjects who died one year after the beginning of the cohort were age-matched with those who remained alive at the end of the cohort period. Treatment adherence was measured through pharmacy records. Patients who received at least 90% of the prescribed doses were considered adherent to treatment. Results Of the 333 patients (52.8% age ≥ 65 years, 67.9% male), 67.3% were adherent to treatment (adherence rate, 87.2%). Mortality was associated with lack of adherence (p = 0.04), presence of symptoms (mMRC ≥ 2) and COPD treatment use. The death was associated with non-adherence, presence of symptoms and previous hospitalization. After adjustment, non-adherent patients to treatment were almost twice times likely to die compared to those adherents (Hazard Ratio (HR) 1.86; CI 1.16-2.98, p = 0.01). Conclusion Non-adherence to treatment was associated with higher mortality among moderate-to-severe COPD patients treated in the Brazilian public health system. Strategies to monitor and optimize adherence should be strengthened to reduce COPD-related mortality.

ABSTRACT Background: Over-the-counter use of ivermectin amongst other drugs as SARS-CoV-2 treatment has been increasingly common, despite the lack of evidence on its clinical efficacy. Objective: To evaluate the effect of ivermectin use on production of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 in health care workers (HCW) diagnosed with COVID-19 and of Th1/Th2 cytokines by stimulated peripheral blood mononuclear cells of the same cohort (PBMCs). Methods: This cross-sectional study evaluated seroconversion and neutralizing antibodies production in HCW at Complexo Hospitalar Universitário Professor Edgard Santos (Salvador, Brazil), diagnosed with COVID-19 from May to July, 2020, as well as in vitro production of antibody against SARS-CoV-2 and Th1/Th2 cytokines. Analyses were performed between December 2020 and February 2021. Participants were stratified according to the use of ivermectin (≤ 1 dose vs. multiple doses) for treatment of COVID-19. Results: 45 HCW were included (62% women). Mean age was 39 years, and disease severity was similar across groups. Neutralizing antibodies were detected less frequently in multiple doses (70%) vs. ≤ 1 dose (97%) groups, p = 0.02). PBMCs of patients in multiple doses group also were less likely to produce antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 following in vitro stimulation with purified spike protein in comparison with patients in ≤ 1 dose group (p < 0.001). PBMC’s production of Th1/Th2 cytokines levels was similar across groups. Abdominal pain (15% vs 46%, p = 0.04), diarrhea (21% vs. 55%, p = 0.05) and taste perversion (0% vs. 18%, p = 0.05) were more frequently reported by participants that used multiple doses of ivermectin. Conclusions: Although there was no evidence for differential disease severity upon ivermectin use for treatment of COVID-19 it was associated with more gastro-intestinal side-effects and impairment of anti-SARS-CoV2 antibodies production, in a dose dependent manner. This potentially impacts the effectiveness of immune response and the risk of reinfection and warrants additional studies for clarifying the mechanisms and consequences of such immunomodulatory effects.

ABSTRACT The outbreak of the new coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) causing the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has spread globally. As of June 18, 2020, a high maternal mortality rate due to SARS-CoV-2 infections was identified in Brazil, representing most of the world cases at that time. An observational, cross-sectional study was performed with pregnant women admitted in two maternity hospitals located in Salvador/Bahia and their newborns, from May 24th up to July 17th of 2020. Among 329 pregnant women enrolled at hospital admission, a high prevalence (n=28; 8.5%) of pregnant women with COVID-19 was observed, as well as a high proportion of asymptomatic cases (n=19; 67.9%). Two newborns had detectable SARS-CoV-2 but evolved without abnormalities. This data highlight the importance of identifying pregnant women with COVID-19 for proper isolation measures to prevent in-hospital transmission.

ABSTRACT Background: COVID-19 pandemic caused increased workload and stress for health professionals involved in the care of such patients. We aimed to describe the health-related quality of life, and burnout in frontline physicians diagnosed with anxiety during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study conducted during the first-wave phase of COVID19, from September to October 2020. Questionnaires were sent electronically to 450 physicians from State of Bahia, assessing symptoms of anxiety, health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and burnout syndrome. For the categorical variables, the Pearson’s chi-square test was used and difference between means was compare using the Mann-Whitney test. was Groups with and without anxiety symptoms were compared using prevalence ratios (PR). Pearson’s correlation measured the correlation between WHOQOL-BREF and MBI (Maslach Burnout Inventory) domains. The Fisher r-to-z transformation was used to assess the significance of the difference between two correlation coefficients. The significance level was <0.05. Results: Out of the 450 physicians, 223 (49,6%) completely answered the questionnaire and 38 (17%) showed symptoms of anxiety. Physicians with anxiety had higher scores in emotional exhaustion (EE) (38.31 ± 8.59 vs 25.31±0.87; p = 0.0001) and depersonalization (DP) (9.0 ± 5.6 vs 5.9 ± 5.3; p = 0.001) domains, and lower scores in personal accomplishment (PA) (32.1 ± 8.2 vs 36.3 ± 7.6; p = 0.004), than those without anxiety. All correlations between WHOQOL-BREF domains and MBI in physicians without anxiety were significant (p = 0.01). Conclusion: Physicians with anxiety showed more emotional exhaustion, less personal accomplishment, and lower quality of life. All domains of WHOQOL BREF were correlated with all MBI domains among physicians without anxiety. Differences in correlation according to anxiety were remarkable in psychological HOQOL BREF domain and emotional exhaustion and depersonalization MBI domains. The effect of anxiety leading to poorer levels of perceived health needs to be further investigated.

ABSTRACT In the pandemic, rapid and accurate detection of SARS-CoV-2 is crucial in controlling the outbreak. Recent studies have shown a high detection rate using saliva/oral fluids as specimens for laboratory detection of the virus. We intended to evaluate the test performance of the Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 cartridge assay in comparison to a conventional qRT-PCR testing, using saliva as biological specimen. Forty saliva samples from symptomatic participants were collected. Conventional qRT-PCR was performed for amplification of E and RdRp genes and the Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 assay amplified E and N2 genes. In the conventional assay, the median cycle threshold value of the E gene was 34.9, and of the RdRp gene was 38.3. In the Xpert Xpress assay, the median cycle threshold value of the E gene was 29.7, and of the N2 gene was 31.6. These results can allow a broaden use of molecular tests for management of COVID-19 pandemic, especially in resources-limited settings.

Abstract Background Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is the cause of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Although Real Time Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (qRT-PCR) of respiratory specimens is the gold standard test for detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection, collecting nasopharyngeal swabs causes discomfort to patients and may represent considerable risk for healthcare workers. The use of saliva as a diagnostic sample has several advantages. Objectives The aim of this study was to validate the use of saliva as a biological sample for diagnosis of COVID-19. Methods This study was conducted at Infectious Diseases Research Laboratory (LAPI), in Salvador, Brazil. Participants presenting with signs/symptoms suggesting SARS-CoV-2 infection underwent a nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) and/or oropharyngeal swab (OPS), and saliva collection. Saliva samples were diluted in PBS, followed by RNA isolation and RT-Real Time PCR for SARS-CoV-2. Results of conventional vs saliva samples testing were compared. Statistical analyses were performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software (SPSS) version 18.0. Results One hundred fifty-five participants were recruited and samples pairs of NPS/OPS and saliva were collected. The sensitivity and specificity of RT-PCR using saliva samples were 94.4% (95% CI 86.4–97.8) and 97.62% (95% CI 91.7–99.3), respectively. There was an overall high agreement (96.1%) between the two tests. Conclusions Use of self-collected saliva samples is an easy, convenient, and low-cost alternative to conventional NP swab-based molecular tests. These results may allow a broader use of molecular tests for management of COVID19 pandemic, especially in resources-limited settings.

RESUMO Objetivo: Comparar os resultados da espirometria de pacientes tratados e curados para tuberculose pulmonar (TBP) com e sem doença pulmonar prévia e analisar os fatores de risco relacionados à gravidade funcional. Métodos: Estudo transversal, multicêntrico, em quatro centros de referência no Brasil. Os pacientes foram classificados em dois grupos: grupo com doença pulmonar prévia ou história de tabagismo (grupo DPT+) e grupo sem doença pulmonar prévia e sem tabagismo (grupo DPT−). Os pacientes realizaram espirometria (pelo menos seis meses após a cura), e foram coletados dados sociodemográficos e clínicos. Resultados: Foram incluídos 378 pacientes: 174 (46,1%) no grupo DPT+ e 204 (53,9%) no grupo DPT−. Na amostra total, 238 pacientes (62,7%) apresentaram alguma alteração espirométrica. No grupo DPT+ houve predominância de distúrbio ventilatório obstrutivo (em 33,3%), e distúrbio ventilatório restritivo predominou no grupo DPT− (em 24,7%). Quando comparados com o grupo DPT+, os pacientes do grupo DPT− apresentaram menos frequentemente alteração radiológica (p < 0,01) e funcional (p < 0,05). Porém, dos 140 (79,1%) do grupo DPT− com radiografia de tórax normal ou minimamente alterada, 76 (54%) apresentaram alguma alteração funcional (p < 0,01). Os fatores de risco relacionados com a gravidade funcional no grupo DPT− foram grau de dispneia (p = 0,03) e alterações radiológicas moderadas ou acentuadas. Conclusões: O comprometimento da função pulmonar é frequente após o tratamento da TBP independentemente do histórico de tabagismo ou doença pulmonar prévia. A espirometria deve ser sugerida para esses pacientes que evoluem com grau moderado/grave de dispneia e/ou alteração radiológica relevante após o tratamento da TBP.

ABSTRACT Objective: To compare patients with and without previous lung disease, in terms of the spirometry results after they had been treated for pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) and cured, as well as to analyze risk factors related to functional severity. Methods: This was a cross-sectional, multicenter study conducted at four referral centers in Brazil. Patients were divided into two groups: those with a history of lung disease or smoking (LDS+ group); and those with no such history (LDS− group). Patients underwent spirometry (at least six months after being cured). Sociodemographic and clinical data were collected. Results: A total of 378 patients were included: 174 (46.1%) in the LDS+ group and 204 (53.9%) in the LDS− group. In the sample as a whole, 238 patients (62.7%) had spirometric changes. In the LDS+ group, there was a predominance of obstructive lung disease (in 33.3%), whereas restrictive lung disease predominated in the LDS− group (in 24.7%). Radiological changes were less common in the LDS− group than in the LDS+ group (p < 0.01), as were functional changes (p < 0.05). However, of the 140 (79.1%) LDS− group patients with a normal or minimally altered chest X-ray, 76 (54%) had functional changes (p < 0.01). The risk factors associated with functional severity in the LDS− group were degree of dyspnea (p = 0.03) and moderate or severe radiological changes (p = 0.01). Conclusions: Impaired pulmonary function is common after treatment for PTB, regardless of the history of lung disease or smoking. Spirometry should be suggested for patients who develop moderate/severe dyspnea or relevant radiological changes after treatment for PTB.

ABSTRACT Background: The 36-Item Short Form Health Survey questionnaire (SF-36) is a widely used instrument for evaluating health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL). The psychometric validation of the SF-36 version 2.0 (SF-36v2) in HIV-infected patients had not yet conducted in Brazil. Aim: To test data quality, reliability and validity of the SF-36v2 as a measure of HRQoL among Brazilian individuals living with HIV. Methods: A cross-sectional study included 393 HIV-infected patients in whom HRQoL was assessed by using the SF-36v2 questionnaire. Demographic characteristics, socioeconomic status and clinical data were also collected. The SF-36 version 1 translated into Brazilian-Portuguese was adapted and introduced version 2 improvements according to the instrument developers. SPSS version 21 was used for data analyses. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and structural equation modelling were performed using AMOS SPSS version 18. T-test for independent samples was used to compare differences between mean levels of HRQoL components in different groups. Linear multiple regression techniques were used to analyze the relationship between Physical Component Summary (PCS), Mental Component Summary (MCS) and independent variables. Results: We performed the CFA and tested the hypothetical measurement model. We included five parameters to improve the adherence of data to the model. All indicators met the requirement suggested by specialized literature (χ2 (gl): 980.7 (527); CFI: 0.949; GFI: 0.873; TLI: 0.943; RMSEA: 0.047; 90% IC: 0.042-0.051). Multiple regression analyses revealed that depression (p = 0.001), family income (p = 0.007), sex (p = 0.001) and age (p< 0.021) were associated with MCS. Comorbidities (p = 0.001), health self-perception (p = 0.001), age (p = 0.001), and sex (p = 0.025) were associated with PCS. Conclusions: A consistent validation of the SF-36v2 in Brazilian HIV patients were shown. Further studies with SF-36v2 psychometric analyses would be required in other populations to establish Brazilian normative data.